Wednesday, January 14, 2004

Socialist Bush Plans 'Healthy Marriage' Program

Whenever there is a problem that exists in the world, you can count on government to want to stick its nose in the picture to manage it.

The New York Times is reporting that President Bush is planning a $1.5 Billion program for the promotion of marriage.

The program would — in true Marxist style — place special emphasis on low-income families. From reading the article, I gather that the stated intent is to educate the people in the program about what kind of person they need to be in order to be married.

Let's forget, for a moment, that the government creates marital trouble every day, as spouses argue over how they are going to afford to live in light of the overwhelming burden of taxation and loss of jobs, created by bad public policy.

And we'll momentarily forget about the fact that we are already spending untold billions of dollars on various other government programs that don't work, are ill-administered, and pertain to areas into which the government has no business sticking its ever-growing nose.

The fact that this worthless socialistic program comes from a Republican administration is further proof that there is no difference between the Republicans or the Democrats. The fact is that they are all Marxist-socialists, dedicated to driving the United States of America into utter and complete financial bankruptcy.

And why are we to believe that because George W. Bush begets a program that it will be any more efficient at accomplishing its stated intent? But you can bet your life that it will be supported by the same phony conservatives who would howl screams of protest if the same program had been attempted by — say, Bill Clinton.

A socialist is a socialist, whether they have a "D" or an "R" after their name, it matters not. And referring to himself as a "compassionate conservative" is an attempt by George W. Bush to mask the fact that he is really a closet communist — and there is nothing compassionate about that.

No comments: