After typing my response, I felt compelled to share my answer with everyone, as I believe it defines the problems and the purpose of all of the controlled opposition — including those on Fox News Channel.
The question was:
I was wondering what your opinion was of Bill O'Reilly, if you are familiar with who he is? And what do you see as an answer to the problems you have sited?
My response follows thusly:
Yes, I know who Bill O'Reilly is. My opinion of him is the same as my opinion of Rush Limbaugh and all of the phony conservatives. He says some things that sound good. But he'll never get to the root of the real problem.
He talks about the border problem, but does he ever really report the fact that we have a border problem by design? Does he ever report that under NAFTA the illegals flooding into this country are considered "migrant workers" and not illegal aliens?
I've heard him rant about the fact that Allen Greenspan has too much power and is accountable to no one. But does he ever talk about what the Federal Reserve System is, what it is designed to do -- namely bankrupt this country and all of its citizens?
It doesn't really matter for whom you cast your vote, the fact is that both political parties are controlled by the same international gangsters. Presidents have their policy dictated to them. And if they don't comply, they aren't around for very long. But Bill O'Reilly won't talk about that. If he did, he wouldn't be on the air for very long.
Has he talked about George W. Bush's profiteering from the war on terror? Has he talked about the fact that the blueprint for the war on terror was written before the 2000 election fiasco for George W. Bush? And the fact that this blueprint laid out the plan for American imperialism and world domination? The blueprint called for regime changes in Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria, North Korea, and others countries. Most notably, communist China was marked for regime change. It is my understanding that China and Russia have a friendship treaty that if one of them go to war, the other will fight with them. We are being led into another world war, our military has been mostly shipped out of this country, and we are being invaded from the south because our borders are not secure. And it's all by design.
Why has Bill's "no spin zone" continued to perpetrate the lie that September 11th was caused by 19 hijackers with boxcutters, when the evidence is so overwhelming that it was a conspiracy at the highest levels of the U.S. government? It was done to create the necessary crisis -- the crisis of "terrorism" -- to serve as the pretense for the U.S. invasion into every country that refuses to surrender to the international globalists. As George W. Bush himself said, "Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." Who are the people that G.W.B. speaks of, when he uses the word "us"? And what is his definition of the word "terrorists"?
Does Bill O'Reilly talk about the Congressional testimony that took place in the late 1990's, by John Maresca of Unocal Oil, which outlined the need for a regime change in Afghanistan so that a pipeline could be built and run through that country? I doubt that O'Reilly connects those dots. Am I, and hundreds like me more clever than Bill O'Reilly and the rest of the neo-cons at Fox News Channel? Or are they just deliberately ignoring the truth so that the American people remain in the dark, until it is too late?
I could go on and on here, but suffice it to say that we are being set up for a huge crisis, the effects of which will be devastating. And no one in the mainstream media is really reporting how dire the situation is, because they all are CONTROLLED. And Bill O'Reilly is no exception. He is yet another mouthpiece for the New World Order crowd. His job is to sound good, so that the average American believes there is a viable alternative to the usual socialist media. The reality is they ALL ARE CONTROLLED.
As far as what answers that I have to offer: I would say that getting informed is of utmost importance. You have to have a strong stomach to be able to face the truth. The circumstance is very dark and dire. However, Jesus said the truth will set us free. If we don't know the truth, we don't stand a chance.
The second solution is to wake up as many people as possible to what is really going on. They may think you're a kook at first, but if you're armed with documentation, they won't be able to argue with you.
Finally, we have to get active in our state and local governments. The only way that we can control the federal government, is through the state governments. It may not be as hard as it sounds. There are some other small groups of people that are working very effectively in various states. I would love to get something started in Michigan. Additionally, all of the United Nations mandates for the curtailment of our private property rights are being implemented at the state and local levels. Lawmakers are largely ignorant of the dangers. They need the citizenry to inform and educate them.
I wrote more to my cousin on a personal level, but the essence of my dissertation has been shared here.
One thing that I forgot to mention in my response is that I have heard Bill O'Reilly openly advocate a "strong central government". This philosophy is in stark contrast to the spirit of the United States Constitution. It was in that document — which is arguably the most anti-government document in the history of mankind — that strict limitations were placed upon the central (or federal) government. And just to be certain that there was no misunderstanding, the Founders stated in the tenth amendment that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." The federal government is a creature of the states. It wasn't the other way around.
The fact that the truth is a threat to the plan for global governance is the reason that the Rush Limbaughs, the Sean Hannitys, and the Bill O'Reillys exist. Their purpose is to make it appear that you're getting the truth when, in fact, they just touch upon some of the issues, rarely delving beneath the surface. And they will never offer any direction when it comes to solutions.
If the American people fail to know what the problems really are, how can they effectively tackle them? If they fail to know who their real enemies and who the real terrorists are, then how can they respond, accordingly? And isn't that the real purpose of the "no spin zone"? To keep Americans in the dark?
No comments:
Post a Comment