"Sustainable Development" is the goal of Agenda 21. The premise is that man cannot live without damaging the environment, wildlife, and all natural resources. Therefore, man's activities must be significantly curtailed to achieve a blissful state that is "sustainable". In all actuality, it's a convenient excuse to use the environment to take away your private property rights, your wealth, and every other right you currently enjoy.
As a part of this program, everyone must be relocated to a "sustainable community". These are communities where land use is tightly managed by housing authorities and zoning regulators. Basically, you will be told what you can do with your land.
There are many different ways that the relocation can occur. The United Nations has been rapidly swallowing up land all around the world. I read an article a while back that said that over 50 percent of the entire state of Alabama had been swallowed up by the United Nations. This is an alarming figure, as this is land that will not be available for the people to live on, farm, or otherwise own.
Article 11, Section 4 of the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage describes the conditions which may entitle the United Nations to take control of property. As you will see, it pretty much covers just about any reason. It says:
"The Committee shall establish, keep up to date and publish, whenever circumstances shall so require, under the title "List of World Heritage in Danger" a list of the property appearing in the World Heritage for the conservation of which major operations are necessary and for which assistance has been requested under this convention. This list shall contain an estimate of the cost of such operations. The list may include only such property forming part of the cultural and natural heritage as is threatened by serious and specific dangers, such as the threat of disappearance caused by accelerated deterioration, large scale public or private projects..."
Too much building. Urban sprawl.
"...or rapid urban or tourist development projects; destruction caused by changes in the use or ownership of the land; ..."
Very vague. Could be anything.
"...major alterations due to unknown causes; abandonment for any reason whatsoever;"
Again, very vague. What "alterations"? And how do they define "abandonment"?
"...the outbreak or the threat of an armed conflict;"
Does this mean that if you have guns on your property, the U.N. may take control of your land? It doesn't specify the threat of a "military" conflict. If the wording is vague, it's vague for a reason!
"...calamities and cataclysms;"
Could be anything. And finally, we have the "natural" disasters.
"...serious fires, earthquakes, landslides; volcanic eruptions; changes in water level, floods and tidal waves. The Committee may at any time, in case of urgent need, make a new entry in the List of World Heritage in Danger and publicize such entry immediately."
Great research and effort has been done in the area of weather modification. It is safe for me to say, at this point, that the weather is easily under the control of the Ruling Elite. This is not a conspiracy theory, as I have seen several websites — including some from prestigious universities — which describe the science of "cloud seeding".
The question is whether or not these so-called "natural disasters" are not so natural. In fact, could they be being created to facilitate the relocation of masses of people from their land and into "sustainable" communities?
Consider the fires that we have had during the summer months for the past several years. It is the faulty environmental agenda, which has caused our forests in the United States to become tinder boxes, ready to ignite. This environmental agenda has its roots in the United Nations.
When a wildfire occurs, under the Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, the United Nations can designate the scorched land as a protected area. The people who had been burned out by the fire, then receive monetary encouragement to build elsewhere in a more "sustainable" community.
If this sounds far-fetched, consider that the United Nations has a world-wide network for monitoring every wildfire on the globe. It is called the Global Fire Monitoring Center.
Ask yourself: Why does the U.N. need to have a network for monitoring every fire on the globe, if they don't intend to take control of the land?
Consider also, that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management has an Office of Fire and Aviation, which — according to the Global Fire Monitoring Center's website is a "is a sponsor of the UN International Forest Fire News (IFFN) and ... administers and protects 262 million acres of America's public lands, located primarily in 12 Western States."
And how are these fires being started? Could laser technology be being used?
In at least one case, a couple of years back, it started as a state agency's "controlled burn". In other words, they admitted that the government set the fire.
The truth is, we don't know how these fires are being started, but we know that the U.N. monitors them, at a great expense. Why, if not to keep track of their progress?
Statement by Environmental activist attorney Daniel Sitarz:
"Agenda 21 proposes an array of actions which are intended to be implemented by every person on earth. Effective execution of AGENDA 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced — a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an precedented redeployment of human and financial resources."
To learn more about Agenda 21, visit Chris Gerner's excellent website, Amerikan Expose.
No comments:
Post a Comment