Meet the women who won't have babies - because they're not eco friendly

I've been accused of being "inflamatory" in the writing of my article, Save the Planet, Kill Yourself?. You be the judge! Read my article, and then compare what you read in the following real life examples from the major press. Do you see any difference in the viewpoints being presented here, versus the ones I wrote about in my article?

This is a dangerous trend, and serves as a conditioning process for the public. If this trend continues, and humans are successfully convinced of their detrimental effects on the planet, the ultimate end will be limits on reproductive rights, such as exist in communist China. Obviously, that's the goal of the United Nations' Agenda 21.

Remember that since the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that CO2 is a "pollutant", that means we all are polluters by virtue of the fact that we breathe. Life is precious; it should be cherished, not despised. It should be celebrated, not dreaded. We do have the right to exist! —D.W.

Meet the women who won't have babies — because they're not eco friendly

By Natasha Courtenay-Smith and Morag Turner
The Daily Mail
November 21, 2007

Had Toni Vernelli gone ahead with her pregnancy ten years ago, she would know at first hand what it is like to cradle her own baby, to have a pair of innocent eyes gazing up at her with unconditional love, to feel a little hand slipping into hers - and a voice calling her Mummy.

But the very thought makes her shudder with horror.

Because when Toni terminated her pregnancy, she did so in the firm belief she was helping to save the planet.

Incredibly, so determined was she that the terrible "mistake" of pregnancy should never happen again, that she begged the doctor who performed the abortion to sterilise her at the same time. [Full Article...]