Follow-up on the Philippines

By Darren Weeks

I've been having what is turning into a rather spirited discussion with a person who contacted me from the Philippines.

This is all in response to the original entry that I wrote on the mudslide in that country.

For those interested, the previous items will appear in the February 2006 archives of this blog.

I will now add more.

This person said,

Hi Darren, I just want to ask, since you're an american, why would the United States fund for cloud seeding in Southern Leyte, Philippines? Isn't it a bit too far from the Balikatan site? (Are you, by the way familiar with the Balikatan exercises? Note though that there are a lot of Filipinos protesting, while there are others supporting, the presence of the US Military here.) Aside from being too far (geographically), having American soldiers exposed to real-life calamities also raises the danger involved with regards to the soldiers acting as rescuers. I also want to mention the fact that a lot of outside help also came in not only from the US but from other countries and international organizations as well.

My point is, I don't think that anybody cloud seeded Southern Leyte. I know, weather manipulation is not new! But don't you think that burying a whole town is a bit too low even for the US?? I hate to say this but you sound crazy.

You know what? I never liked the US government, but in times like this, I would like to say thank you for having rescuers here. Whatever the US military agenda is, at least they are helping.

Also with regards to the globalwarming fact, it's not a meaningless cliche. And we are not helpless about it. *link*, *link*

And I'm sorry about that business over there that got it's roof blown out.

My response to this message is what follows:

Thanks for checking back. I'd rather have done this by e-mail, but this venue will work, I guess.

First, I never said that cloud-seeding had anything to do with the Balikatan exercises. As I understand it, the Balikatan exercises were a joint war game operation between the U.S. and Philippine militaries. Correct?

Do the Balikatan exercises continue today? I know they discontinued them for a while, due to a disagreement between our governments.

Either way, obviously, if what happened was a manipulation of the weather, it was a covert operation. That doesn't necessarily mean that the aircraft would be military aircraft. In my part of the world (I live in southern Michigan, U.S.A.), they are constantly spraying something in the skies. I have sat on my deck and watched as they have turned a clear day into an overcast day by going back and forth with these jets in the skies. This is NOT ordinary jet exhaust.

Without understanding the conditioning process of the controllers, everything I say will sound nuts. You really should study the Hegelian Dialectic. It is the process by which they condition people to accept changes that they ordinarily would reject.

I don't make this stuff up.

They create the problem, then they create their own opposition to the problem, and finally they present the pre-determined solution to the problem -- which is what they wanted to do to begin with.

A perfect example of that is the "problem" of terrorism. Americans are more willing today to relinquish their liberties than they were before 9/11. But we weren't really attacked on 9/11. It was a scam. That is easily proven with documentation. Go to http://911.sweetliberty.org.

I don't doubt that there are some Filipinos who welcome the U.S. military. When the help is needed, it isn't very likely it will be refused.

Regardless, if the crisis wasn't a natural occurance, then it certainly accomplished the end of getting our military into your country where they otherwise might not have been as welcome.

You said,

"...having American soldiers exposed to real-life calamities also raises the danger involved with regards to the soldiers acting as rescuers".

You have to understand that the dirtbags who are in control think we're overpopulated, anyway. They don't care about the loss of life. They only want to control the world. That may sound crazy, but I've done plenty of research. How about you?

You said,

"I also want to mention the fact that a lot of outside help also came in not only from the US but from other countries and international organizations as well."

Precisely! This is an "international operation". In other words, a U.N. operation. Your country is being invaded by foreign military and you are grateful it's happening because there's a crisis. But is it a created crisis for the purpose of invading your country? That's the question that we cannot know for sure.

You said,

"My point is, I don't think that anybody cloud seeded Southern Leyte."

I sincerely hope that you're right. But you have to keep an open mind to the possibility. Disasters are great tools for the globalists.

You said,

"I know, weather manipulation is not new! But don't you think that burying a whole town is a bit too low even for the US?? I hate to say this but you sound crazy."

First of all, burying a town is nothing to those who are in power. It really has nothing to do with the U.S. The globalists control many countries. I believe the war on terror is intended for them to shore up their power in the countries that won't go along with the program of world governance.

I acknowledge that the truth is difficult to believe and may sound crazy. But that is why you have to do research. The documentation speaks for itself. Please study the Hegelian Dialectic. Some people call it "problem, reaction, solution" while others refer to it as "thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis".

No matter what you call it, it is a very effective tool for conditioning people to accept changes they would ordinarily reject. Creating a crisis, anticipating the reaction to it, and presenting the pre-determined solution.

People won't oppose the solution when it is presented, because they have been confronted with a problem that demands it -- even though the problem might never have materialized had it not been CAUSED by the same people who now want to "solve" it. The people are being manipulated without even knowing it.

Again, I'm not saying FOR SURE that is what happened in your country. I just suggested that it is possible.

As far as those in control of the U.S. government being evil enough to kill innocent people to get their way, I suspect that you are quite naive.

I'll refer you to the declassified documents of "Operation Northwoods", where the U.S. government was planning acts of terrorism upon American citizens in order to start a war with Cuba. The "Northwoods" operation was never executed, but the declassified documents (pdf format) prove that those in positions of power within the U.S. government were seriously considering it.

September 11th is an example of a time where they did execute their Shadow operation.

There are many other examples of terrorist acts that the globalists who control our government have executed.

For example, the U.S. has admitted it tested nerve gas on American soldiers. That story was from the Guardian out of Britain.

Please don't dismiss me as some kook, without looking into the facts. It's vital for everyone to understand what's really going on today.

A silent, undeclared war is being waged upon all of humanity. It's imperative that everyone awakens to the reality.

I'm not crazy; I'm just well-researched.

Now, on a more personal and softer note, I do want to extend my deepest condolences for you and everyone in your country.

Despite the aforementioned statements, I do recognize that it is a very dark hour in your part of the world. Please know that nothing I've ever said was intended to trivialize the pain and suffering of the victims and their families.

If it was construed that way, then I offer my sincerest apologies.

God bless, Darren

P.S. Hey, I almost forgot... regarding the "global warming" debate...

I've interviewed the head of the Science and Environment Policy Project, Dr. Fred Singer, on my radio broadcast some months ago. He is an atmospheric physicist, and professor at George Mason University and professor emeritus of environmental science at the University of Virginia. He says that there is nothing we can do about global warming.

I've also repeatedly interviewed Professor James McCanney, M.S., another physicist who studies weather and weather-related patterns and he says that humans are not causing global warming. Hence, there is nothing we can do about it.

I would like to also call your attention to the Leipzig Declaration (1997), the Statement by Atmospheric Scientists on Greenhouse Warming (1992), the Heidelberg Appeal (1992), and the Oregon Petition (1998) -- all drawn up by real scientists who dispute the notion that humans are causing global warming.

If we're not causing it, there's NOTHING we can do about it.