Last Monday and Tuesday I sat in for Jackie Patru on her shortwave broadcast on WWCR. During both nights, I gave a history on the details of weather modification. Archives of the shows are posted here.
During the broadcast, I blasted "late night talk show hosts" who say that "the weather has changed", but never discuss weather modification technology. The implications of these show hosts, I asserted, was the same as the United Nations and the environmentalist extremists — that humans are destroying the environment with their pollution, their CO2 emissions, etc. The obvious "remedy" that is implied by these people is that human behavior must be curtailed to avoid catastrophic atmospheric changes.
So, imagine my surprise to find that Art Bell is spending his entire show tonight discussing weather modification with Whitley Strieber and Will Thomas. They are talking about cloud seeding, Project Stormfury, and a whole lot of other things that we've been discussing on Sweet Liberty and Amerikan Expose.
It could be a coincidence. But Art has never talked about weather modification on his broadcast before, to my knowledge. And for me to have just made the statement on the air that he never covers it, to have him cover it the following weekend, was an interesting "coincidence", indeed.
But what Art "the-sky-is-falling" Bell failed to talk about on his broadcast is the likely motive behind such operations. Motives such as the seizure of more property by the state, under the auspices of the United Nations.
The United States government signed onto the World Heritage Treaty in the 1970s.
The World Heritage Treaty gives reasons why the United Nations says it should be able to control land in UN member nations. It says in Article 11, Section 4:
"The Committee shall establish, keep up to date and publish, whenever circumstances shall so require, under the title 'List of World Heritage in Danger' a list of the property appearing in the World Heritage for the conservation of which major operations are necessary and for which assistance has been requested under this convention. This list shall contain an estimate of the cost of such operations. The list may include only such property forming part of the cultural and natural heritage as is threatened by serious and specific dangers, such as the threat of disappearance caused by accelerated deterioration, large scale public or private projects or rapid urban or tourist development projects; destruction caused by changes in the use or ownership of the land; major alterations due to unknown causes; abandonment for any reason whatsoever; the outbreak or the threat of an armed conflict; calamities and cataclysms; serious fires, earthquakes, landslides; volcanic eruptions; changes in water level, floods and tidal waves. The Committee may at any time, in case of urgent need, make a new entry in the List of World Heritage in Danger and publicize such entry immediately."
— World Heritage Treaty, December 17, 1975
The United States government is implementing the World Heritage Treaty, and other environmental policies which originate from the United Nations.
Weather modification is essential to these plans, as they are able to create the crisis, blame it on human activity, and make the case that humans must quit using their air conditioners, driving their cars, barbecuing their steaks, burning trash, etc.
In keeping with their motto, "Ordo Ab Chao" (Latin meaning, "order from chaos"), they use the Hegelian process of creating the problem, so they can use it to argue for change.
Furthermore, under Agenda 21 — the blueprint for sustainable development — populations of people are to be moved out of rural areas to the large cities. "Natural" disasters are a convenient way to accomplish this agenda, as few would expect that these anomalies were created for such a purpose.
For those who doubt that the scenario outlined above could be true, ask yourself the question: Why does all flood insurance come from the same place? Why is it that you can buy flood insurance from any insurance company, but it all comes from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)? Might FEMA only disburse disaster aid on the condition that individuals relocate to another area?
Furthermore, what purpose would the United Nations have in establishing a Global Fire Monitoring Center, to monitor every in the world, if it isn't to monitor their progress?
Before calling me names such as "kook", or "nutcase", those thinking this sounds like wide-eyed conspiracy theory, need to do their own research. The reality of this plan is easily verifiable, if you're willing to read what the enviro-globalists say.
But don't rely upon Art Bell to spell it out for you. Judging from the masonic pyramids and other occult symbolism that appeared on his site during his full time hosting days, I'd say he is likely the mouthpiece of the New World Order. If he's not, he sure seems to be operating within their dialectic.
The reality is that if global warming is actually taking place — and there are many scientists who still dispute this claim — it is highly likely that man has nothing to do with it, at all.
The greater probability is that changes in the earth's temperature are all a part of a natural cycle of the earth, and they would occur regardless of what human behavior entailed.
That tame likelihood may not make for great radio material for alarmists like Bell, who count on sensationalism to bring in the ratings, but it stands as the greatest explanation for some of the phenomenons we presently experience that are being blamed on human activity.
The rest of the occurrences can be explained by artificial weather manipulation, or modification of the weather by way of artificial means.
To Bell's credit, he has finally introduced his listeners to the concept; better late than never, I say.
But until he connects the activities with its real motives, he'll continue to operate within the framework of thinking, that the controllers intend. He'll keep his listeners trapped into believing that weather manipulation — while it may have unpleasant, unintended consequences — is really being executed for benevolent purposes.
But then, when you're listeners truly believe they are being abducted by aliens, perhaps the concept of governmental benevolence isn't such a difficult one to grasp.
No comments:
Post a Comment