September the eleventh was an event, orchestrated by traitors in the United States government, to create public support for a war. It would be a war, virtually without end. The purpose of the war would be to dwarf the world's largest superpower financially, and extinguish her beacon of freedom.
The war would also further enrich the rogue nation-state of Israel, which is already the world's most weathy nation.
Finally, it would be used to demonize and overthrow any government or individual that stood in the way of the plan for a one-world government that would be ruled from the throne of Israel.
I realize to the average individual reading the above statements — without any prior knowledge of their basis in fact — they'll sound as steeped in fairytale as Santa, the tooth fairy, and the Easter bunny.
I assure you, I'm not crazy. I have arrived at these conclusions after hours of research and careful study.
There is no question that there is a conspiracy of Biblical proportions to institute a one-world government. George Herbert Walker Bush spoke of it when, during his presidency, he mentioned the New World Order. Prior to that time, anyone who ever used the phrase, "New World Order" was thought of as a kook, a nutcase, and fodder for the men in the white coats to take away.
But the 41st president of the United States openly spoke about a time when a New World Order would be born. I have already commented about his speech and that of British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, following the attacks. Both men spoke of using crisis to "reorder" the world.
I strongly urge the reader to take a moment and read my brief dissection of their words, as I believe that my comments will shed light on the secret agenda of those in power. It is an agenda of world-wide socialism. The enemy truely is within our gates.
The speech that George Herbert Walker Bush made at the beginning of the first Gulf war, was made on September 11th, 1990. I know this to be the case because I pulled the speech from the National Archives, personally. Was the date of the speech a coincidence?
Consider this: George Bush announced that the War in the Gulf was underway on September 11, 1990. Exactly eleven years later — TO THE DAY — with another Bush in office, the attack on America commenced, which led to the second part of the U.S. war with Iraq.
As a schoolboy, I wasn't yet aware of the conspiracy that exists in America. I subscribed to the Detroit News and took the morning paper to school every day. I read the developments of the Gulf war. At the conclusion of the conflict, I remember wondering, Why aren't they finishing it? Saddam is still in power?
I believe that the answer lies in the fact that September 11th, 2001 was planned as early as 1990. To be sure, all of the details hadn't been worked out, at that point. But they left Hussein in power, so that they could finish the job when all of the pieces were in place for a full-fledged war on terrorism, which would really be a war for world government.
We know that Bush planned to overthrow Saddam Hussein, even prior to becoming president. That evidence exists in the form of a report, written in 2000 for Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, et al. The report is entitled, Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century (pdf format). I learned about it from a newspaper in Britain called the Sunday Herald. In an article, dated September 15, 2002, the Herald stated:
A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.
The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice- president), Donald Rumsfeld (defence secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And Resources For A New Century (pdf format), was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century (PNAC).
The plan shows Bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says: 'The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.'
The PNAC document supports a 'blueprint for maintaining global US pre-eminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international security order in line with American principles and interests'.
The truth of the matter is that we have no interest over there. We have no business in the Middle East — period.
But why does this report exist, if those in power today, didn't know they would come to power? Did Bush know that he was going to be "elected" president? If so, how could he have known, if the elections are not rigged? Why would anyone go to all of trouble to plan Defense strategy for a presidency that might very well never happen? If the elections are honest, the possibility well exists that they might not even gain the power necessary to execute the plan?
