By Darren Weeks
So we're at war. Another un-Constitutional, un-declared war.
First of all, I want to say that I am not a pacifist. If we were really attacked, I have no problem with our government going to war to defend us. That's supposedly the reason why we pay so dearly for a military.
However, the reality is that the present war on terror is a hoax. There an enormous amount of evidence that September 11th was orchestrated by our own federal government in cooperation with the Israelis for the purpose of taking away the land and resources from the Arab nations..
As outrageous as it sounds — especially given the relentless propaganda by the controlled media — it is my firm belief that the attack on the World Trade Center was not the work of 19 Arabs with boxcutters.
Think of how ridiculous that story sounds, anyway. Boxcutters? We are supposed to believe that everyone on those planes allowed themselves to be hijacked with nothing more than boxcutters. Yeah, and I have some ocean land in Nevada that I'm wanting to sell.
At any rate, that is the official story, and most Americans, being victims of the media, believe what they are told. As Dr. Richard Day stated in the New Order of the Barbarians, Americans are too trusting. They do not ask the right questions.
Now, September 11th is being used as a springboard for a war that will never end. Make no mistake about this. It will lead to World War III, if the planners have their way.
Just like the war on drugs, the war on poverty, crime, etc., the so-called "War on Terror" will accomplish the exact opposite of its stated intent. Everything that the government declares war on, we get more of. Instead of alleviating terror, we will have more of it.
We terrorized Afghanistan in "retaliation" for September 11th — an event that our own government orchestrated. Hard to believe? It won't be if you realize that they've done it many times before.
Now, we're terrorizing Iraq in retaliation for... ? Existing?
Bush has accused Saddam and company of having "weapons of mass destruction."
First of all, no evidence has ever been presented by the administration of war-mongerers, that any "non-approved" weapons exist. No evidence, that is, except the word of the administration. Care to take the word of a politician?
And who are we to determine what weapons they can and cannot have? Why should anyone listen to the United Nations? They don't have national sovereignty preservation as their goal.
Secondly — and more importantly — even if he does have them, big deal! We have them. Israel, Iraq's greatest enemy, has them. Other nations that are a much greater threat than Iraq have them. Why aren't we bombing the hell out of China? They have them. What about Russia? They have them.
I have heard no evidence — not even trumped up evidence — that indicate that Saddam Hussein is a threat to our national security. Therefore, we have no business being over there.
Consider this: If Iraq had the weapons that they are accused of having, it would seem to me that the opportune time for them to use them is when they first were invaded. Why did they wait? Didn't they miss their opportunity to use these weapons that they have supposedly worked so hard to keep hidden?
Iraq is a sovereign state. As a sovereign state, they have the right to defend themselves just as much as any other country.
What about oil?, you ask. Even if Iraq's oil wasn't available to us, there are several other nations from which we can buy oil. And the truth is, we have enough of our own oil right here in the United States, if the socialists in our government and the environmental groups would just shut up about drilling here.
The fact is that Israel wants to control the land and resources of the Arab nations, and they are using the United States military as their means to accomplish the dirty deed.
Our politicians do the bidding of Israel. The American taxpayer pays, by extortion, money to the federal government. That money is then funneled to Israel. Much of it returns to the U.S. in the form of bribes for our politicians. So much for government by the people and for the people.
The war on terror is a war that can never be won, because its objective remains open-ended and unclear at best. It will continue as long as the controllers want it to, or until enough Americans get fed up with their blood-thirsty rulers, and demand them to stop.
"Terror" is not a defined enemy. It is an idea, or a behavior. You cannot declare war on an idea or a behavior. To do so, would be as frivolous as declaring war on saddness, anger, or frustration.
Furthermore, the word "terror" can have different meanings. Who is responsible for defining what terrorism is and is not? Your Department of Homeland Security?
What happens if your opinion comes down on the wrong side of an issue? Do you become a suspect? The administration has already stated that if you ask too many questions, you could face charges. Does this sound like freedom to you? We are told that we are fighting this war for freedom.
What is the objective in this war on terror? And when will the killing end? How many more sovereign nations will we invade and conquor?
The answer, if the world's troublemakers have their way, is that the war on terror will not stop until we have world peace. And that, my friend, is a synonym for a new world order.
