Broadcast media outlets are reporting at this hour that only Iraqi police are being allowed to carry guns. Iraqi civilians are being forced to disarm.
Could it get any more obvious that the Iraq war is a United Nations operation?
As I survey the U.S. Department of State's mission, and our global United Nations "peace" force, there can be little doubt that the U.S. government and the United Nations are really siamese twins.
Now the major controlled media is admitting that the United States/Nations-installed government in Iraq is disarming the people in order to fight "insurgents".
Who are the "insurgents" and what do they want? For what do the "insurgents" fight? If the United States/Nations were giving the people of Iraq the opportunity to experience the same freedom the people of America have enjoyed for over 200 years, then for what purpose would the "insurgents" be trying to spoil it?
Could it be that the oft-villainized "insurgent" movement is much better informed than most Americans about why the country of Iraq has been overthrown? Could it be that they've been able to understand that what the United States/Nations governing entities really desire is to eliminate the autonomy and sovereignty of all nations, including Iraq? Could it be possible that they are in a position of understanding that the only chance they have of ever living as a free people, is to fight, to the death, the occupying forces — most of whom are well-meaning soldiers that are still brainwashed into believing that they are fighting for freedom?
H.G. Wells said,
"Armament should be an illegality everywhere, and some sort of international force should patrol a treaty-bound world. Partial armament is one of those absurdities dear to moderate-minded 'reasonable' men. Armament itself is making war. Making a gun, pointing a gun, and firing it are all acts of the same order. It should be illegal to construct anywhere upon earth any mechanism for the specific purpose of killing men. When you see a gun it is reasonable to ask: 'Whom is that intended to kill?'"The United States is no longer a sovereign country. Our communist occupiers have given our sovereignty away to a global governing body, comprised of multi-national corporations and non- and intra-governmental organizations. Our once-great military machine has become an extension of the U.N. and its relentless aggression against independent and sovereign countries. Our federal government is thoroughly controlled by communists, and opportunist profiteers.
If these statements sound outrageous, then ask yourself a few pointed questions:
- Why we are continuing our entanglement with the World Trade Organization — an involvement which requires us to put our own businesses at a global disadvantage?
- Why are we continuing to recognize WTO "Most Favored Nation" principles and treaties which are resulting in hundreds of thousands of jobs being lost to a communist country that has threatened to nuke us?
- Why have the Clinton and Bush administrations seen fit to provide tours to communist Chinese leaders of our military facilities, and to allow the People's Liberation Army to learn how we do battle, by observing U.S. military war exercises?
- Why are we allowing them to buy up our critical infrastructure, including sea ports, water treatment, communication, and electric generation facilities? What is the real purpose of Executive Order 12803, "Infrastructure Privatization"? And why have our presidents, regardless of political affiliation, worked together to allow foreign interests to take over critical aspects of our country's infrastructure under the guise of privatization?
- Why is our highway system being revamped with toll-road corridors, financed by international interests, complete with "inland ports"?
- Why do we have the China Ocean Shipping Company and the Orient Overseas Container Line in U.S. ports every day? Why is it that less than 2 percent of their freight is inspected before it comes into our country?
- Why is it that the Russian and Chinese military have engaged in joint military exercises, preparing for war with the United States? Why have both the Bush and Clinton administrations continued to pretend that the twin communist countries of Russia and China are our friends, even as they prepare for war with us?
- Why is it that, despite our government trying to convince us that there really is a threat of terrorism, we somehow still cannot seem to stop the migrant workers from coming into our country? Why do they continue to make noises about "guest worker" programs, while they dispatch a handful of military to the border?
"Homeland Security" is a sick joke!
It isn't that difficult to secure our borders. Bring our military home and put them all on our border. Announce that anyone crossing illegally will be shot, and then follow through on your promise. I guarantee very few rounds will be needed. Somehow, the fear of being on the wrong end of a barrel blast is an incredibly-effective deterrent for both criminals, and criminal trespassers.
Perhaps, that's why the Iraqis are being disarmed. Perhaps, the "insurgents" recognize that their country has been invaded by foreign trespassers and they are fighting the takeover. Maybe the "insurgents" are just people who love Iraq and fight for their homeland. For this crime, they must be disarmed. For this crime, they must be destroyed.
Perhaps, the migrants are being allowed into the U.S. to ultimately create the chaos and civil unrest necessary to lead to American disarmament. There can be no doubt that the seeds of civil war are being sewn in our nation.
The United States representative to the United Nations is John Bolton. He is also the Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security. The U.S. State Department also has the Bureau of International Security and Non-Proliferation. Their goal is the disarmament of every country.
The U.S. military has already been internationalized. Few soldiers who find themselves on foreign battlefields are aware that they are members of the international "peace" force and are fighting for the establishent of the new global Order.
The war on terror is actually a war to force nations to disarm. A country that cannot defend itself, has no sovereignty.
If the United States and the United Nations weren't one and the same, then why is the U.S. representative to the United Nations responsible for "international security"? Why is it the U.S. Department of State's place to be concerned about the "security" of the rest of the world, even as they adhere to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Executive Order 13107, which makes our country vulnerable to invading migrants?
The war in Iraq is not about "liberating" the Iraqi people from the clutches of a mad dictator. The United States embraced Saddam Hussein as an ally back in the 1980s. Equally, it is not about oil, as many people believe today.
It is about controlling a sovereign country, its people, and neutralizing the opposition to the global establishment.
The Iraqi people have seen their military taken over and controlled by the United States/Nations "peace" force. Now, there is a weapons ban in place, a curfew, and restrictions on travel. It's a police state that is being built for their "security", their own protection, their own good.
It's called global "democracy". They will give up their freedom for their security.
Aldous Huxley, the demonic author of Brave New World said,
"The thin and precarious crust of decency is all that separates any civilization, however impressive, from the hell of anarchy or systematic tyranny which lie in wait beneath the surface."As it is in Iraq, so it goes in America. You'd better grip those firearms tight.
No comments:
Post a Comment