Voters in FloriDUH

My reaction to this National Public Radio piece on election chatter at a barbecue house in Florida.

As I listened to the voters in the above NPR feature, it occurred to me that these are classic victims of the Hegelian Dialectic. Everything they said was within the boundries of what the ruling elite want them to think. No one ever wanders outside the framework of "knowledge" that has been spoon-fed to them by the mainstream (controlled) media.

Why do people believe everything they are told without question? Why don't people ask questions?

"With more than five million people voting, the Florida recount in the 2000 election came down to 500 votes."

How do we know this is true? Because the media told us so? Who counted the votes? Who controlled the numbers? What was the real function of the Voters News Service (VNS)? Was it to help count the votes, or was it to control the numbers and, subsequently the outcome? Why did the director of VNS become very nervous when Victoria Collier asked him on the phone for more information about his organization?

Do the elections matter anyway? Both Al Gore and George W. Bush are both candidates who would advance the United Nations diabolical agenda in the United States. Both are closet communists dedicated to the absolute destruction of the country.

Don't believe that? Then you need to do your research. There is plenty of evidence that supports that claim.

The 2000 election circus — a created crisis, in my thinking — was orchestrated to create the "problem" that would illustrate the "need" for a new computerized voting system to be adopted nationwide.

This is the Hegelian Dialectic in operation. The PROBLEM > REACTION > PRE-DETERMINED SOLUTION. Create a problem (thesis), fashion the reaction (antithesis), then present the agenda that you wanted to get instituted as the solution (synthesis, and the basis for a new thesis) to the problem you created.

Does it work?

Listen to the people in the NPR clip and you tell me if it works.