WAR IS GOOD — YOU GET TO BE CANNON-FODDER, KEEP THE POPULATION DOWN, AND DIE A HERO
"Anyhow, the new system would be brought in, if not by peaceful cooperation – everybody willingly yielding national sovereignty – then by bringing the nation to the brink of nuclear war. And everybody would be so fearful as hysteria is created by the possibility of nuclear war that there would be a strong public outcry to negotiate a public peace and people would willingly give up national sovereignty in order to achieve peace, and thereby this would bring in the New International Political System.
"This was stated and very impressive thing to hear then... 'If there were too many people in the right places who resisted this, there might be a need to use one or two – possibly more – nuclear weapons. As it was put this would be possibly needed to convince people that we mean business.'
"That was followed by the statement that, 'By the time one or two of those went off then everybody – even the most reluctant – would yield.'
"He said something about 'this negotiated peace would be very convincing,' as kind of in a framework or in a context that the whole thing was rehearsed but nobody would know it. People hearing about it would be convinced that it was a genuine negotiation between hostile enemies who finally had come to the realization that peace was better than war.
"In this context discussing war, and war is obsolete, a statement was made that there were some good things about war... one, you're going to die anyway, and people sometimes in war get a chance to display great courage and heroism and if they die they've died well and if they survive they get recognition. So that in any case, the hardships of war on soldiers are worth it because that's the reward they get out of their warring.
"Another justification expressed for war was, if you think of the many millions of casualties in WWI and WWII, well… suppose all those people had not died but had continued to live, then continued to have babies. There would be millions upon millions and we would already be overpopulated, so those two great wars served a benign purpose in delaying over-population."
From the Associated Press news wire:
Port Isabel, Texas-AP — For one small Texas town, today is a
bittersweet mix of grief and patriotism. That's after a ceremony
made Private David Cuervo a U-S citizen, one month after he was
killed in Iraq. Cuervo's mother says she's proud of her son's
sacrifice.
Mothers: Quit sending your babies to fight and die in a needless war! If you need reasons not to let them go, get them here.
If that isn't enough, here's more.
Having your children die, fighting to advance an agenda of world-wide totalitarianism is not something of which to be proud. You have the responsibility as parents to protect them. Whatever you have to do, don't let them go!
I'm not a pacifist. If the cause was just, and in the interest of the American people, then the fighting would be noble.
But American soldiers are being used as pawns in the war for a one world socialist government. And any deaths to further that cause, are senseless and garnished with shame.
"In defense of the World Order, U.S. Soldiers would have to kill and die. ... We are not going to achieve a new world order, without paying for it in blood, as well as in words and money." — July/August 1993 - Foreign Affairs article titled, "Back to the Womb" by Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.
No comments:
Post a Comment